Anyone with a quarter of a brain knows that World War Three is a good idea for precisely zero of the estimated 8.2 million human beings on this Earth.
The prospect of nuclear conflict in an age where the destructive capabilities of mankind’s weaponry have exceeded sense and sensibility is terrifying indeed – and yet it very much appears as though that’s the way we’re headed, albeit currently at a steady crawl.
With already strained global tensions being stretched further every month, one wonders how the powers that be can possibly prevent the outbreak of a war the likes this world has never seen. There is a chance that ultimately wisdom prevails and no one instigates a conflict highly likely to be the end of us all, but there’s also the very real possibility that the wrong individual makes a rash decision, effectively dooming most of the rest of the people on Planet Earth.
With that in mind, it’s probably a good idea that you know where not to be in the event that WWIII does end up happening. Given the aforementioned phenomenal power of the missiles in the arsenals of today, nowhere in the world is truly safe if the superpowers decide to start throwing warheads at one another.
That being said, there are places that are decidedly more dangerous than others. According to analysis from the Daily Express, below are the six places that will be the worst to live in or be in if the war to end all wars breaks out.
